Opposing party · Case 26-102221-PP
02 PPO Pet Motion To Show Cause
Canonical record: rockenhaus.net. Disputed domains are indexed at /disputed-domains/ (not authoritative).
Loading document…
Filing text (searchable excerpt)
STATE OF MICHIGAN r "j0 CASE NO. and JUDGE
MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE
3RD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ~ 26-102221-PP / Hon. Miller Martin
WAYNE COUNTY FOR VIOLATING VALID PERSONAU
FOREIGN PROTECTION ORDER In the matter of contempt of
Conrad Rockenhaus
Court address Coleman A. Young Municipal Center, 2 Woodward Avenue Court telephone no.
Detroit, Ml 48226 (313) 224-5261
( R) Petitioner's name Respondent's name, address and teleph one no .
V
\.:'.:/ Adrienne Rockenhaus Conrad Rockenhaus
Address and telephone no. where court can reach petitioner
no known address
26695 Ross Drive , Redford , Ml 48239
Not Known , Ml 48239
(734) 585-6277
IAFFIDAVIT AND MOTION I
(S) 1. I am the protected party in a valid personal/foreign protection order dated ____F_e_b_ru_a_ry..__2_0_,_,_2_0_2_6____ and
issued by the 3rd JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Court, case number 26-102221-PP
Attached is a copy of that order and either proof of service on or notification to the respondent of that order.
@ 2. The respondent has violated the order by doing the following :
Explain what has happened and include dates, times , and events (attach any supporting documents, such as a co mplaint filed with the police.)
1. Premeditated and Willful Violation (The Driveway Drop-Off) The Respondent's disregard for this Court's Ex
Parte Personal Protection Order (Case No. 26-102221-PP) is premeditated and willful. On February 23, 2026,
prior to the Respondent's release from federal custody, I formally served his federal defense attorney, Kaycee
Berente , with "Actual Notice" of the order, explicitly instructing his legal counsel that he was legally barred from my
residence, vicinity, and digital infrastructure. Despite his attorney possessing undeniable knowledge of this state
court order, the Respondent still orchestrated his physical transportation directly to my driveway upon his release
from prison , where local Redford police had to formally read him the order to force him off the property. He knew
the PPO existed before he arrived ; he breached the physical perimeter anyway, and he is now attempting to
breach the digital perimeter.
2. Third-Party Proxy Harassment & Stalking After failing to breach my physical property, the (continued on next
page)
3. I request the court to order the respondent to appear at a specified time to answer a contempt charge or to issue
a bench warrant for the arrest of the respondent.
4. This affidavit is made on my personal knowledge and , if sworn as a witne s I can testify competently to the facts
in this affidavit.
( E1 State of Oklahoma County of Major Signature
~
Excerpt of 17774 characters. Download the full PDF for complete text.
About this filing
02 PPO Pet Motion To Show Cause: opposing-party filing by Adrienne Rockenhaus (aka Adrienne Blair aka Adrienne Hein (@adezero)) in Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Personal Protection Order (PPO)), Michigan Case No. 26-102221-PP, Wayne County Circuit Court. PDF and searchable text at rockenhaus.net (canonical court record). Disputed third-party domains: /disputed-domains/.
- File name
02_ppo_pet_motion_to_show_cause.pdf- Case number
- 26-102221-PP
- Category
- Opposing party
- Disputed domains
- View disputed domains (asserted controlled by Adrienne Rockenhaus; not authoritative).
- Related context
- FAQ, Joe Prich evidence, Rob Hein
- Canonical record
- rockenhaus.net