Filed by Conrad · Case 26-102221-PP
03 Motion Deny False PPO Violation Claims 2026-04-10
Canonical record: rockenhaus.net. Disputed domains are indexed at /disputed-domains/ (not authoritative).
Loading document…
Filing text (searchable excerpt)
MOTION TO DENY FALSE PPO VIOLATION CLAIMS
Source PDF: motion_deny_false_ppo_violation_claims_fullcompressed.pdf
Pages: 42
Case: 26-102221-PP, Wayne County Third Circuit Court (PPO docket)
Author: Conrad Alan Rockenhaus, Respondent (pro se)
Text extracted from embedded OCR layer of source PDF.
PAGE 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
3RD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, WAYNE COUNTY
Adrienne Marjorie Rockenhaus,
Petitioner,
V.
Conrad Alan Rockenhaus,
Respondent.
Case No. 26-102221-PP
RESPONDENT'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO DENY FALSE PPO
VIOLATION CLAIMS, STRIKE PETITIONER'S PUBLIC SOCIAL MEDIA
ACCUSATIONS, AND FOR SANCTIONS AND JUDICIAL NOTICE
Respondent Conrad Alan Rockenhaus, appearing pro se, respectfully moves this
Honorable Court for an emergency order: (1) formally denying and striking Petitioner
Adrienne Rockenhaus's publicly disseminated false accusations that Respondent
violated the Personal Protection Order (PPO) via anonymous or pseudonymous text
messages, a Signal account bearing a fictional persona name, and an unsolicited food
delivery; (2) correcting Petitioner's false public claim that Respondent was 'removed'
from the Delonis Center; (3) taking judicial notice that both the Ann Arbor Police
Department and the Redford Township Police Department independently investigated
Petitioner's PPO violation reports, found them to be without merit, declined to arrest
Respondent, and advised Respondent to report Petitioner's conduct to this Court; (4)
taking judicial notice of Petitioner's bad-faith social media conduct; and (5) imposing
sanctions for Petitioner's deliberate manufacture of false PPO violation reports. In
support, Respondent states:
PAGE 2
I. BACKGROUND
1. On or about March 29-30, 2026, Petitioner published a series of posts on her
public X.com account (@adezero) publicly accusing Respondent of contacting
her via anonymous 'burner' phones in violation of the PPO.
2. Specifically, Petitioner posted: 'Confirmed from reliable source this is Conrad's
Moto G Play Burner phone on the Verizon network in Ann Arbor.' This post
received 489 views and was reposted multiple times, creating a widespread and
false public narrative that Respondent committed criminal PPO violations.
3. In that same cluster of posts, Petitioner also publicly stated: 'Ann Arbor police
went to look tor him at that Huron address yesterday and were told by the facility
he was removed.' This statement falsely implies that Respondent was expelled
or removed from the Delonis Center as a result of misconduct or law
enforcement action.
II. PETITIONER'S CLAIM THAT RESPONDENT WAS 'REMOVED' FROM THE
DELONIS CENTER IS FALSE, RESPONDENT DEPARTED AS PART OF A
PLANNED HOUSING TRANSITION TO A PERMANENT APARTMENT
4. Respondent was not 'removed' from the Delonis Center. Respondent's
departure from the Delonis Center was a planned, voluntary transition facilitated
jointly by the Delonis Center and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
as part of Respondent's participation in a veteran transitional housing program.
5. Specifically, the Delon is Center and the VA coordinated to move Respondent
from transitional housing into a permanent apartment as a positive step in his
housing stabilization. Respondent executed a lease agreement tor his new
apartment at Meadowbrook Village on March 27, 2026, two days before
Petitioner made her false 'removed' claim publicly on March 29-30, 2026.
PAGE 3
6. Respondent's executed lease agreement (Meadowbrook Village, signed
March 27, 2026) is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is incorporated by
reference. This document conclusively establishes that Respondent's departure
from the Delonis Center was a planned housing transition, not an expulsion,
removal, or law enforcement action of any kind .
7. Petitioner's public characterization of this planned transition as Respondent
Excerpt of 38184 characters. Download the full PDF for complete text.
About this filing
03 Motion Deny False PPO Violation Claims 2026-04-10: filing by Conrad Alan Rockenhaus in Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Personal Protection Order (PPO)), Michigan Case No. 26-102221-PP, Wayne County Circuit Court. PDF and searchable text at rockenhaus.net (canonical court record). Disputed third-party domains: /disputed-domains/.
- File name
03_Motion_Deny_False_PPO_Violation_Claims_2026-04-10.pdf- Filed date
- Case number
- 26-102221-PP
- Category
- Filed by Conrad
- Disputed domains
- View disputed domains (asserted controlled by Adrienne Rockenhaus; not authoritative).
- Related context
- FAQ, Joe Prich evidence, Rob Hein
- Canonical record
- rockenhaus.net