Filed by Conrad · Case 26-104594-DO
12a Chain Of Custody Supplement Scrape Evidence 2026-05-13
Canonical record: rockenhaus.net. Disputed domains are indexed at /disputed-domains/ (not authoritative).
Loading document…
Filing text (searchable excerpt)
STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE
FAMILY DIVISION, DOMESTIC RELATIONS
ADRIENNE MARJORIE ROCKENHAUS, Case No. 26-104594-DO
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
Hon. Nicole N. Goodson
v.
CONRAD ALAN ROCKENHAUS,
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.
DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S CHAIN OF CUSTODY SUPPLEMENT: SHA-256 HASH MANIFEST FOR MAY 12-13, 2026 SCRAPE
EVIDENCE
I. PURPOSE
1. This Chain of Custody Supplement is filed in support of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Preservation Order and Order Prohibiting Spoliation of
Evidence, filed contemporaneously herewith. It documents the cryptographic integrity of the public-record Twitter scrape datasets referenced in that Motion at §III.G ¶31
("the May 12, 2026 Scrape Evidence," used in the Motion and herein as a collective reference to the captures made on both May 12 and May 13, 2026).
II. CAPTURE METHODOLOGY
2. The scrape datasets were captured between approximately 22:21 UTC on May 12, 2026 and 01:01 UTC on May 13, 2026 by Defendant using the Apify platform's tweet-
scraper actor (https://apify.com). Each capture targeted specified X (formerly Twitter) account handles, conversation identifiers, or date ranges via the actor's input
parameters. The actor returned aggregated tweet records as JSON arrays containing platform-native metadata fields including, but not limited to, tweet identifiers,
conversation identifiers, in-reply-to identifiers, author profile information, timestamps in Twitter time format, source application identifiers, and user_mentions entities.
3. Each capture was saved as a single JSON file with a filename incorporating the targeted account or query subject and the UTC timestamp of capture completion. The files
have not been modified after capture other than by file-naming. The contents are byte-for-byte identical to the data returned by the Apify actor.
III. SHA-256 HASH MANIFEST
4. The following table identifies each of the eighteen scrape files comprising the May 12, 2026 Scrape Evidence by filename, captured size in bytes, and SHA-256
cryptographic hash. The hash values were computed at approximately 02:00 UTC on May 13, 2026 using the Python hashlib.sha256 implementation. Verification of
any file's hash against the table value confirms the file is byte-for-byte identical to the captured original.
Size
# Filename SHA-256
(bytes)
1 apify_adezero_rosebuttcheeks_2026-05-12_2237UTC.json 23,151,037 9c3086e0d2cd97f8a541415a6c900f3936162fd1154e93048bc7beda1865f0ea
2 apify_rosebuttcheeks_MintyCrafty_2026-05-12_2221UTC.json 1,292,858 ab3fc7eb0e2bc431ae1749671c75b095c606c5642cbe1bbade6342ab50a4c6b4
3 apify_adezero_thru_2026-04-11_2026-05-13_0021UTC.json 3,737,523 92827c76af54dee83b64e9d728206cb47c8b0cf44ac152c1dde67e7a634df7ee
4 apify_spuntpatrol_partial_2026-05-13_0022
Excerpt of 8140 characters. Download the full PDF for complete text.
About this filing
12a Chain Of Custody Supplement Scrape Evidence 2026-05-13: filing by Conrad Alan Rockenhaus in Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Divorce), Michigan Case No. 26-104594-DO, Wayne County Circuit Court. PDF and searchable text at rockenhaus.net (canonical court record). Disputed third-party domains: /disputed-domains/.
- File name
12a_Chain_of_Custody_Supplement_Scrape_Evidence_2026-05-13.pdf- Filed date
- Case number
- 26-104594-DO
- Category
- Filed by Conrad
- Disputed domains
- View disputed domains (asserted controlled by Adrienne Rockenhaus; not authoritative).
- Related context
- FAQ, Joe Prich evidence, Rob Hein
- Canonical record
- rockenhaus.net