Filed by Conrad · Case 26-104594-DO

04 Omnibus Motion Three Layer 2026-04-16

Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Divorce) · Wayne County Circuit Court (Third Judicial Circuit), Hon. Nicole N. Goodson · Filed 2026-04-16

Canonical record: rockenhaus.net. Disputed domains are indexed at /disputed-domains/ (not authoritative).

Loading document…

Filing text (searchable excerpt)

STATE OF MICHIGAN

                 IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE
                                FAMILY DIVISION, DOMESTIC RELATIONS

 ADRIENNE MARJORIE ROCKENHAUS,                                       Case No. 26-104594-DO
   Plaintiff,
                                                                     Hon. Yvonna C. Abraham
 v.

 CONRAD ALAN ROCKENHAUS,
  Defendant.

  DEFENDANT'S OMNIBUS MOTION FOR ORDER TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE, FOR
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE AND ACCOUNTING, AND FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY
  RESTRAINING ORDER REGARDING PREMARITAL DOMAIN ROCKENHAUS.COM

NOW COMES Defendant, Conrad Alan Rockenhaus, appearing pro se, and pursuant to MCR 2.310, MCR
2.313, MCR 3.206, MCR 3.310, MCL 552.401, and MCL 600.2950, respectfully moves this Honorable Court
for three forms of emergency relief that are unified by a single underlying reality: Plaintiff has demonstrated
a sustained, premeditated pattern of destroying, concealing, and converting Defendant's assets and
evidence, and without immediate court intervention, she will continue to do so. These three forms of relief
are presented together because they are inseparable. Evidence preservation without financial disclosure is
blind. Financial disclosure without evidence preservation is empty. And both are meaningless if Plaintiff is
simultaneously allowed to permanently dispose of Defendant's premarital property. In support thereof,
Defendant states as follows:

                                 I. COMMON FACTUAL BACKGROUND
1. Defendant is a 100% service-connected disabled United States Navy veteran. His sole sources of
   income are VA Disability Compensation and SSDI benefits, compensation paid by this nation for
   permanent injuries sustained during combat operations including a traumatic brain injury with seizure
   disorder caused by an improvised explosive device.
2. During Defendant's incarceration at FCI Milan, Plaintiff served simultaneously as his SSA-appointed
   Representative Payee, his Power of Attorney holder, and his approved employer through Cannabytes,
   LLC. These roles gave her legal access to and fiduciary control over Defendant's finances, benefits,
   private records, and digital infrastructure.
3. Plaintiff used these positions of trust to: divert approximately $39,326.87 in federally protected VA
   Disability Compensation and SSDI benefits into accounts under her sole control; access Defendant's
   va.gov account using his id.me credentials without authorization; make false representations to
   Defendant and his appellate attorney that his SSDI payments had been suspended while she was
   actively receiving them; plan and execute a scheme to render Defendant homeless upon his release
   from federal custody; file a retaliatory PPO two days after Defendant filed his Motion to Sever; make
   false statements to law enforcement; and retain Defendant's personal property, identification documents,
   and premarital internet domains.
4. On February 9, 2026, Plaintiff sent written communications to Defendant's federal appellate attorney
    admitting that Defendant would be released with "$0.00 accessible cash," that she had formally revoked
    her residence as his release option, and that she was retaining counsel to secure a restraining order
    barring him from accessing his financial assets. These are not allegations. They are Plaintiff's own
    written admissions.
 5. Three active law enforcement investigations document the scope of Plaintiff's misconduct: VA OIG Case
    No. 2026-18750, SSA OIG, and Ann Arbor Police Department Case No. 26-11892. The Social Security
    Administration has issued a formal demand for the return of $12,074.50 in overpayments addressed to
    Plaintiff as Defendant's Representative Payee.
 6. This pattern of conduct, documented in Plaintiff's own writings and in federal and state investigative
    records, establishes that the risks addressed in each of the three parts of this motion are real,
    i

Excerpt of 18543 characters. Download the full PDF for complete text.

About this filing

04 Omnibus Motion Three Layer 2026-04-16: filing by Conrad Alan Rockenhaus in Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Divorce), Michigan Case No. 26-104594-DO, Wayne County Circuit Court. PDF and searchable text at rockenhaus.net (canonical court record). Disputed third-party domains: /disputed-domains/.

File name
04_Omnibus_Motion_Three_Layer_2026-04-16.pdf
Filed date
Case number
26-104594-DO
Category
Filed by Conrad
Disputed domains
View disputed domains (asserted controlled by Adrienne Rockenhaus; not authoritative).
Related context
FAQ, Joe Prich evidence, Rob Hein
Canonical record
rockenhaus.net
Direct PDF link
https://rockenhaus.net/wayne_do_26-104594-DO/filed/04_Omnibus_Motion_Three_Layer_2026-04-16.pdf