Filed by Conrad · Case 26-104594-DO
04b Supplement Omnibus Part One 2026-05-06
Canonical record: rockenhaus.net. Disputed domains are indexed at /disputed-domains/ (not authoritative).
Loading document…
Filing text (searchable excerpt)
STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE
FAMILY DIVISION, DOMESTIC RELATIONS
ADRIENNE MARJORIE ROCKENHAUS, Case No. 26-104594-DO
Plaintiff,
Hon. Nicole N. Goodson
v.
CONRAD ALAN ROCKENHAUS,
Defendant.
DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEMENT TO PART ONE OF OMNIBUS THREE-LAYER MOTION
(EVIDENCE PRESERVATION)
NOW COMES Defendant, Conrad Alan Rockenhaus, appearing pro se, and pursuant to MCR 2.310, MCR
2.313, and the Court's inherent authority to preserve the evidentiary record in pending litigation, respectfully
submits this Supplement to Part One of his Omnibus Three-Layer Motion (the "Omnibus Motion"), filed in
this matter on April 15, 2026 and presently calendared for hearing on June 4, 2026.
This Supplement does not seek new relief beyond the framework already requested in the Omnibus Motion.
It expands the categories of evidence subject to the preservation order requested in Part One to include
specific digital, account, and surveillance categories that have become evidentiarily significant since the
filing of the original Omnibus Motion. In support thereof, Defendant states as follows:
I. RELATIONSHIP TO ORIGINAL OMNIBUS MOTION
1. The Omnibus Motion is incorporated by reference. Part One of the Omnibus Motion identifies eight
categories of evidence (Categories A through H) for which preservation is sought under MCR 2.310,
MCR 2.313, and the spoliation framework set forth in Teel v. Meredith, 284 Mich App 412 (2009).
2. This Supplement adds Categories I through N to the preservation request. The legal authority, the
evidentiary foundation, and the relief framework remain as set forth in the Omnibus Motion and are not
restated here.
3. The events giving rise to this Supplement are documented in Defendant's Second Supplemental Motion
to Modify, Extend, or Terminate Personal Protection Order, filed in Wayne County Case No. 26-102221-
PP on May 6, 2026, which is incorporated by reference for its factual content. A copy of that motion
accompanies this Supplement as Exhibit 1.
II. SUPPLEMENTAL FACTUAL BASIS
4. Since the filing of the Omnibus Motion on April 15, 2026, the following developments have made specific
additional categories of evidence preservation immediately necessary.
5. Compromise and operation of Defendant's Apple ID and email accounts. Defendant's Apple ID
account, his primary email account at conrad@rockenhaus.com, and his professional email account at
conrad@cannabytes.net have remained outside Defendant's control since his federal incarceration
period beginning September 4, 2025. These accounts are functional 2FA recovery channels for federal
accounts including Login.gov, ID.me, VA.gov, and CAC.mil. Plaintiff retained operational access to these
accounts during Defendant's incarceration and has not relinquished that access.
6. Compromise and operation of Defendant's Facebook account. As documented in the Second
Supplemental Motion in Case No. 26-102221-PP at paragraphs 8 through 19, an account bearing
Defendant's name and likeness on the Facebook social media platform was used on May 4, 2026 to
publish a post falsely representing that Defendant was deceased and naming five identified persons,
including witnesses material to this proceeding, as responsible for the purported death. Defendant did
not author that post, was not deceased on May 4, 2026, and was not in possession of the credentials
used to publish the post on that date. The login credentials, login records, and account control records
for that account are evidence directly relevant to the claims and defenses in this action.
7. Operation of an additional Facebook account configured to amplify content adverse to
Defenda
Excerpt of 14891 characters. Download the full PDF for complete text.
About this filing
04b Supplement Omnibus Part One 2026-05-06: filing by Conrad Alan Rockenhaus in Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Divorce), Michigan Case No. 26-104594-DO, Wayne County Circuit Court. PDF and searchable text at rockenhaus.net (canonical court record). Disputed third-party domains: /disputed-domains/.
- File name
04b_Supplement_Omnibus_Part_One_2026-05-06.pdf- Filed date
- Case number
- 26-104594-DO
- Category
- Filed by Conrad
- Disputed domains
- View disputed domains (asserted controlled by Adrienne Rockenhaus; not authoritative).
- Related context
- FAQ, Joe Prich evidence, Rob Hein
- Canonical record
- rockenhaus.net